ADVERTISEMENT

STOCK REPORT: Offense vs Purdue

Lots of narratives from this game, I dream of these kinds of games when it comes to Stock Report. Time to cut through the hyperbole and let the numbers do the talking.
I wanted to break down where the offense has changed from last season, why JJ is excelling because of it, and how much of the run game struggles can be tied to opposing defenses.
I have some theories about Donovan Edwards usage in the passing game, and how I think the run game will expand moving forward.
Colston Loveland is having a great year, but if they start taking advantage of one thing, it could be an unbelievable finish to the season.
And yes, offensive line talk. Great day for the interior, the outside, not so much. Why and what it means for Penn State.

TOP story on ESPN (11/7, 5 PM EST)

Sources: Michigan says Rutgers, Ohio State, and Purdue shared their signs

It seems that ESPN has finally started to pick up the information Michigan is starting to leak and is posting ...While we all could care less what ESPN says or does, especially after carrying O-H-SOFT's water the past several weeks, they do have pull with the casual sports person who can be swayed by their stories and click-baiting reporting.

To me, this is even more evidence that the Michigan plan to fight back is in full swing and working, with more ammo in the chamber, it seems.

Kudos to UM, Santa Ono, and Regents for fighting back on this

On the legality of stealing and sharing signs

I wanted to talk about a point that is being missed with the new developments.

UM has turned over proof that coaches and staffers from three schools collaborated to create a spreadsheet of stolen signals from UM. You are undoubtedly seeing posts that say, "So what? That's not against the rules." My response to that is "exactly, that's the damn point."

Let me explain a bit. Let's pretend that all the signals gathered by these teams were obtained perfectly within the rules. The signals were decoded by using game film, TV broadcast recordings, all-22 video, etc. That means that using ONLY the permissible forms of scouting, these teams were able to decode what amounts to the entire UM playbook. They were able to do it without sending some loser to sit in the stands and record with a damn cellphone.

How were they possibly able to do this? We've been told over and over by talking heads and rival coaches that we gained a massive advantage with the video from the stands. Really? Because from what I see, these teams decoded an entire playbook using legal means. So the advantage gained by recording in person is . . . what, exactly? It's almost as if the multiple prior statements of the NCAA that video from the stands provides a negligible advantage was accurate.

And one last point. To those who tell you what these teams did is within the rules, that's not at all accurate. What these teams did might not violate NCAA rules. But the Big Ten rules were certainly broken. The Big Ten doesn't have any rules about sign stealing at all. They just have a vague concept of sportsmanlike/unsportsmanlike conduct. Can any reasonable person say that three teams collaborating to create a spreadsheet collecting one team's plays in a bid to beat that team is sportsmanlike?

Having said all of that, remember this: you violate the concept of sportsmanship at the discretion of the commissioner. Basically, the commissioner is the sole authority in deciding what is or isn't sportsmanlike. He can say what Conor Stalions did was unsportsmanlike and then turn around and say that every team in the conference sharing signals to make sure UM loses is completely sportsmanlike. It would be ludicrous, but he can 100% do that.

Does the Wakeyleaks precedent apply to UM, Purdue, Rutgers and OSU?

As folks may recall, it was revealed that a Wake Forest radio commentator was providing Wake’s plays and calls to several opponents. Assistant coaches from Virginia Tech, Louisville and Army were later suspended (from 1 game to 2 weeks) and/or fined ($25k each) for the act of accepting the stolen plays. The radio guy was fired. None of their head coaches were penalized.

It would seem this establishes a precedent for any assistant coaches or staffers who are found to have accepted stolen signs from third parties - including Stalions.

B1G cannot punish an in-flight NCAA investigation before NCAA issues punishment

32.2.2(C) NCAA Initiated Cases. The Compliance and Reinstatement Subcommittee shall review violations by member universities as determined by the NCAA and may impose penalties in addition to those imposed by the NCAA for any violations.
1. Where the NCAA initiates a preliminary or official inquiry with a member university the Conference will cooperate with university and NCAA representatives in the processing of that case through the normal NCAA investigation, hearing and appeal processes.
2. While the case will be processed through normal NCAA channels, the Conference Compliance and Reinstatement Subcommittee shall review the case and may impose additional penalties, if warranted, subsequent to the NCAA action.

From MGoBlog (https://mgoblog.com/diaries/legal-analysis-big-ten-rules-don't-allow-insta-punishment-michigan)

So they would need to go after sportsmanship clause for sign stealing NOT in person scouting... Feels like with the recent drips that is extremely relevant.
  • Like
Reactions: alibaba

Tie breaker



So if I understand this we have to go #5

Michigan played:
Purdue
Nebraska
Minnesota

PSU played:
Iowa
Northwestern
Illinois

OSU played
Wisconsin
Minnesota
Purdue


Rite now those records are

Conference record of opponents
Michigan 7-11
OSU 7-11
PSU 8-10

Total record of opponents
Michigan 12-15
OSU 12-15
PSU 15-12

Purdue is killing us and Iowa is helping PSU

We’re getting closer to teams getting exposed for sharing sign stealing…

From my understanding, there’s three in particular.

What is with the Conor Stalions hero worship?

This lunatic has put this season in jeopardy and could cost the best team in decades a right to reach their potential. The vast consequences of his juvenile behavior could span years if it costs the program Harbaugh. And yet, I continue to see Michigan fans on multiple boards laughing and celebrating his exploits. WTF is happening?

I would suggest the school with the most elaborate and sophisticated sign stealing operation is

The Ohio State University.

No one can argue that OSU without knowing all of UGA's signs were able to keep pace with UGA.

UGA and Michigan are very similar in how we're built. We destroyed those nuts.

Obviously the NUTS cheated by having in person scouting at the SEC championship game, as they were hopeful they'd get to play UGA.

UGA needs to produce information regarding their signs not being changed from the SEC championship game to their game with OSU in the 1st round of the play offs.

If true UGA needs to name OSU as being culpable in stealing their signs and explain why they believe this is true.

Furthermore, OSU can do so with all eyes on Michigan allowing OSU to cheat with no suspicion on their illegal processes.

Remember, Meyer had one coach follow Michigan. For him to follow us, he attended every single one of our games

Read Section 6 story about real american hero

Let's go and do this rite. Give Maizenblue_follower a great holiday season. Our vets and a Michigan man like this deserves it. Let's go and be the leaders and best.

Leaving the Big Ten is fan fiction, nothing more. But...

... what would it look like if we did?

First, we'd need to understand that without OSU, we're less valuable. Michigan and OSU are defined by The Game and the history of the rivalry. Remove that and you have something less, for each.

That said, any conference would still take us.

And our leaving the Big Ten would leave OSU no reason to stay; they'd probably be in the SEC in no time.

I think Michigan and Ohio State splitting up would be a tragedy for college football and sporting culture in America, but I'm playing along with a fantasy that Michigan were petulant enough to take our ball and go home. So let's run with it.

Like it or not, the academic associations matter to the University, so we're not going to the SEC or Big 12. The only option is the ACC.

People can call it a "dying conference" all they want, but the grant of rights has effectively prevented anyone from leaving.

If OSU went to the SEC, Penn State would surely follow us wherever we went. They, too, care about the academics, so would not be wild about the SEC or Big 12.

Adding Michigan and Penn State would revitalize the ACC.

Not only that, but with the ACC, weirdly, already having taken Cal and Stanford, the four other Pac-12 schools that jumped to the Big Ten would probably follow Michigan and Penn State, if their whole value proposition for joining the Big Ten were gone.

Michigan leaving would start dominoes falling that would quickly end the Big Ten.

The ACC becomes a coast-to-coast superconference that includes USC, Stanford and Michigan, which would finally probably be too much for NOTRE DAME to say no to. They'd play Michigan every year, and have Cal or Stanford on their schedule 4 of 6 years. They would get the national exposure they desire in a conference that spans from Miami to Seattle, from LA to Boston.

In this scenario, SMU re-thinks their decision to join the ACC and instead joins the Big 12, opening things up for Maryland to re-join UVA, UNC and Duke - where they have always belonged.

ACC West: USC, UCLA, Cal, Stanford, Oregon, Washington
ACC North: Notre Dame, Michigan, Penn State, Syracuse, BC, Pitt
ACC Central: Clemson, UNC, Duke, Virginia, Virginia Tech, Maryland
ACC South: Miami, FSU, Ga Tech, Louisville, NC State, Wake Forest

The SEC would have a quandary in that they'd want a second team to take along with Ohio State. And probably two more after that to get to 20.

Nebraska would be one. They bring that huge fan base, and you can reunite them with Texas, aTm, Oklahoma and Missouri.

After that, I think MSU/Wisconsin are the way to go as opposed to Iowa/Illinois.

So here's a new 20-team SEC...

SEC West: Texas, Texas A&M, Oklahoma, Missouri, Nebraska
SEC North: Ohio State, Michigan State, Wisconsin, Kentucky, Tennessee
SEC Central: LSU, Arkansas, Ole Miss, Mississippi State, Vanderbilt
SEC South: Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Bama, Auburn

What's left of the Big Ten would join up with the Big 12 except Rutgers. Rutgers has no value without Fox forcing Big Ten Network onto NY-area cable systems by bundling it with YES. They would opt for SDSU instead. Upgrades the product more and gives the West a 6th team.

Their new 24-teamer...

Big 12 West: Arizona, Arizona State, Utah, BYU, Colorado, San Diego State
Big 12 Central: Oklahoma State, Kansas, Kansas State, Iowa, Iowa State, Minnesota
Big 12 South: Baylor, Houston, Texas Tech, TCU, SMU, UCF
Big 12 Midwest: Illinois, Northwestern, Indiana, Purdue, Cincinnati, WVU

UCF is stuck in with the Texas schools, but direct travel between Orlando and any of the Texas campuses isn't too bad.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT