In 2018 and 2019
- By KevinWerner
- The Den
- 3 Replies
Ohio States offense scored on (if my quick count is right) 16 of 22 possessions against us. 15 were touchdowns. I bet percentages like that weren't matched against their garbage non conference teams for the last 30 years. But they reached it against us to that degree in a game we prepare all year for with a hall of fame coach. A rather insane outlier on the side of good performance.
Why?
They had great players, played really well AND had us scouted exceptionally well (and I've always assumed at least partially illegally).
Who was I mad at?
Don Brown and Jim. They know what we are doing guys. Fix it.
This is why you see pros saying "it's called scouting".
This is also why you see anonymous coaches saying things alongs the lines of "yeah, they were cheating BUT...we knew it was coming and made changes"
They want to taint the win but not implicate themselves in negligent coaching. Because they know its part of their damn job to not get their signals picked.
Further the mechanics of knowing a signal (IF you do know it and it hasn't been changed) and turning that into getting the players to do something different on the field because you know that signal are complicated so the impact isn't nearly what people it is. In fact, when OSU sputtered the last couple of years offensively in the second half, I grinned wondering if we were throwing off their scouting operation with intentional false indicators. What I'm getting at is that the marginal impact of knowing a sign at any given time (vs. standard scouting and prep while including opportunity to be WRONG), let alone the margin between one obtained by sideline coaches/tv film or illegally obtained scouting is sooooooooo thin.
Yet this thing reads as if Michigan is watching practice video.
hopefully someone at some point is going to do some journalism that explains why this is not a level I violation (nor should it be) and the scandalous equivalent of Pete Rose betting against his team.
Why?
They had great players, played really well AND had us scouted exceptionally well (and I've always assumed at least partially illegally).
Who was I mad at?
Don Brown and Jim. They know what we are doing guys. Fix it.
This is why you see pros saying "it's called scouting".
This is also why you see anonymous coaches saying things alongs the lines of "yeah, they were cheating BUT...we knew it was coming and made changes"
They want to taint the win but not implicate themselves in negligent coaching. Because they know its part of their damn job to not get their signals picked.
Further the mechanics of knowing a signal (IF you do know it and it hasn't been changed) and turning that into getting the players to do something different on the field because you know that signal are complicated so the impact isn't nearly what people it is. In fact, when OSU sputtered the last couple of years offensively in the second half, I grinned wondering if we were throwing off their scouting operation with intentional false indicators. What I'm getting at is that the marginal impact of knowing a sign at any given time (vs. standard scouting and prep while including opportunity to be WRONG), let alone the margin between one obtained by sideline coaches/tv film or illegally obtained scouting is sooooooooo thin.
Yet this thing reads as if Michigan is watching practice video.
hopefully someone at some point is going to do some journalism that explains why this is not a level I violation (nor should it be) and the scandalous equivalent of Pete Rose betting against his team.