ADVERTISEMENT

Raheem Anderson pushing Greg Crippen for starting center

Michigan's offensive line will have five new starters in 2024.
While the battle at RT has been well documented, HC Sherrone Moore offered details on another position battle happening along the offensive line.
🔗🔽

Fall Camp Position Breakdown: EDGE

Derrick Moore and Josaiah Stewart will lead the EDGE group in 2024, but depth is developing.
Will we see more of a duo leading the way this season, or will someone like TJ Guy get heavy reps in the rotation? What freshman is poised to breakout?
🔗🔽

OT: Huge series

For Tigers. 3 games against one of the teams in string WC position. With the trade deadline looming, the next 3 games could help tip the direction the Tigers go.

I imagine they get rid of Flaherty regardless, but a sweep may just change their minds IF the offers aren’t too good. Like if they get offered a mid-level prospect, do you just see how this season goes and take the risk of losing Flaherty for nothing if it means making a playoff run? Obviously if you get a good offer you almost have to take it regardless.

I don’t think Skubal should even be a consideration, but a godfather deal might just make them stop and think for a minute. I would hate to see it tho. Build around your young stars. Extend the guy and use him as a centerpiece.

Crootin....

.... This year is a little bit different than a lot of years..

People started complaining about how slow recruiting was because we only had four recruits.

Now those same naysayers, winers, complainers, etc. Seem to think we're gonna. Have hard time holding on to all the great recruits.We have now.

Fifteen out of sixteen recruits that we have verbally committed are considered blue chip on one side or another. .

So can someone explain to me when we finished the year with the top 10 class? Probably top 8 with the direction Things are going what people are gonna complain about then?

What Gets Cut?

The ‘long form’ of the negotiated settlement of the three huge lawsuits by former players against the NCAA was delivered to a federal judge yesterday for approval. It may take a little time for the judge to approve the settlement, no one is asserting that it will be materially changed.

The important part of the settlement which had been rumored earlier is the formula for calculating the maximum amount of revenue sharing which schools will be able to pay their athletes. This pool is a portion of athletic department revenues that can be shared with student athletes. Without addressing the questions of which athletes will share in the pool or how much Michigan might plan to share, maybe we should ‘run the numbers’ based on the language from the settlement.

Using the language from the settlement, the maximum amount that Michigan could share with athletes in the upcoming year would be between $50-55 million.

This isn’t new money, it’s a share of existing athletic department revenues. It’s a maximum amount that can be shared. Michigan or other schools can decide not to share any of the defined revenue streams. Some schools will decide to share their maximum amounts.

This definition of maximum revenue sharing has nothing to do with NIL. NIL payments are separate from the sharing of athletic department revenues defined by the settlement.

You can be certain that our athletes have read the reports on the settlement language and have probably run the numbers themselves. If you simply divided the maximum pool by the total number of our men’s and women’s team athletes equally, each of our 1,032 student-athletes would receive a little more than $235,000 next year.

Now for the key question. Those revenues are being used to fund athletic department expenses. Our athletic department budgets are separate from the University General Fund. Athletics doesn’t request funding from the University, nor does it return any revenues that go unspent.

There are several questions that result from this settlement but the key one given the way our athletic department is financed is — if substantial amounts of athletic revenues are shared with student-athletes, what athletic department expenditures get cut?

Will we eliminate sports, reduce the size of athletic staffing, hold back on facilities improvements, pay employees less, raise ticket prices? One thing is certain — the student athletes will have calculated what they can be paid and they’ll be looking to ‘get theirs’.

How are the payments to athletes funded? What gets cut?

Okay so now the Nuts NIL number is $20 million for this season


According to their AD
I remember hearing $15 million earlier… I’m sure their collectives are pretty pissed about the last few years… Earning a boost of $5 million more for their players or whomever🤔

Ironically, that’s the new annual number for all sports salaries that was laid out in the preliminary NCAA settlement discussion
  • Like
Reactions: Macdaddy7657

Three Biggest Takeaways from Big Ten Media Days

It was an impressive showing for Michigan and new head coach Sherrone Moore at Big Ten Media Days.
These are my three biggest takeaways including the QB battle, this team fearing no one, and why Donovan Edwards is Michigan's most important player.
🔗🔽
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT