WTF are you talking about?The battle cry of modern day Michigan Football
Actually, seems quite appropriately...
I'm constantly amazed at how many Michigan fans read Sharp. He's strictly sparty and like most reporters and newscasters today, preaches his own agena vs the actual news.This is why Drew Sharp is ONLY a fan and journalist because he has no clue about football and what good coaching can mean within a program. Quite frankly, there have been many Michigan fans on here over since Harbaugh got the job also predicting that Michigan can only win 6 games this year becuase they don't have this or that and that it is impossible to beat MSU or OSU this year. The one thing that clearly separates us from the Buckeyes is they are coached well and play with confidence: Urban Myer is a great coach because he can take a player and COACH them to play in his system which is whatever system is going to benefit his team. Huge difference from guys like Rich Rod who immediately try to play kids in system that does not their display athletic strengths. The difference? Rich Rod's first year at Michigan trying to run a spread option offense with players that simply did not have the athletic abilities to do it and his God awful 3-3-5 with slow people. Urban's first year at OSU UNDEFEATED with players that were 6-7 the year before. This is where people are dismissing Harbaugh and saying that is does not have the talent this year to win 6 games. Bullshit!!!! Harbaugh will place his players this year in a position to succeed for the team and they will win possibly 10 games. Hell, Mattison transformed Rich Rod's God awful defense in 1 year from 109th to 16 th overall and only lost two games with them!!!!!!! Michigan fans and others that are saying "Urban inherited better players than Harbaugh-WHY DON'T YOU GO AHEAD AND THROW IN THE TOWEL RIGHT NOW AND DECLARE MICHIGAN WITH 5 LOSSES INCLUDING THE OSU GAME BFORE WE KICK OFF!!!!! YOU HAVE LOST IN YOUR MIND BEFORE THE GAME IS EVEN PLAYED. I bet Harbaugh is not coaching this way!!! He doesn't give a shit about last year. Michigan had excellent recruiting classes under Brady during this tenure, however, they were not coached. Last year, they quit on Brady. Under Harbaugh, Michigan will win 10 games this year and I will be posting on here in November laughing my ass off about it. THEY HAVE THE PLAYERS NOW AND THE COACHING TO GO ALONG WITH IT.
Dude. Who cares a rats arse about high school rankings. Once on campus they mean squat. Who from UM, based on performance over the past few years would start on MSU's team this year??????Dude, are you completely oblivious or are you 12 years old? Look at each player's rankings on both squads. We are full of 4/5 stars and you are not. So yes coming out of HS Michigan players are FAR higher rated. Having said that MSU players perform way better and have developed way more. That means we have talent but it just has not been developed. I refuse to believe that all these players we recruited were so overrated.
Green - 5 star
Kalis - 5 star
Peppers - 5 star
Morris - 4/5 star
Isaac - 5 star
Darboh - 4 star
Charlton - 4 star
Richardson - 4 star
Bolden - 4 star
Houma - 4 star
Jenkins-Stone 4 star
Kugler - 4 star
Bars - 4 star
Braden - 4 star
Butt - 4 star
Ways - 4 star
Mone - 4 star
You really want me to keep going? Here's my suggestion - tying Googling some information before you make emotional claims. Nobody is arguing that MSU won't be good - great coach, and great teams the past few years, but I am arguing that Michigan has the potential to be as good if not better. Coaches matter. We went from 7-5 to 11-2 with CRAP talent in Hoke's first year. Look at what JH did with the 49ers with essentially the same talent. Look at Auburn 2 years ago when they almost won the entire thing. Look at what Urban did. Coaching matters as do D-coordinators, if not then why even hire good ones. Michigan will have a Top 3 D-coordinator in all of college football and a Top 5 coach in ALL of football. MSU has a great coach but you lost potentially a Top 3 D-coordinator.
H2H agreed M has cleaned our clock. But we've suffered thru some real crappy coaches just like the last couple with M. So records can be a reflection on how good your coach is obviously. What I think is a joke are the records prior to MSU joining the Big Ten and having to play all games in AA.Let's chat in a few months when you crawl back into hibernation like you guys do every 5 years for a decade. Also, check the H2H record of the 2 schools...stop looking at stupid 5 year windows. Michigan will win a BIG title within the next 3 years that I am sure of. But since you feel the need to have the last response, go for it with random timelines and your final responses. Not sure there is point in going back and forth with you because I think if Dantonio took a crap you would think it's gold.
H2H agreed M has cleaned our clock. But we've suffered thru some real crappy coaches just like the last couple with M. So records can be a reflection on how good your coach is obviously. What I think is a joke are the records prior to MSU joining the Big Ten and having to play all games in AA.
As for dantonio crapping gold, it is my understanding that every M fan thought Bo crapped a gold bouillon. We Spartan fans hope we have our version of Bo.
Ugh!! Here we go again! Deck Head and his point of WISHFUL wisdom. Run along now, Kelly and his make believe group of national; contenders in South Bend are waiting for you as they prepare to play the Coast Guard after Army, Navy, and Air Force on their schedule. Fear is a terrible thing. It's ok. Harbaugh and company will not set foot in South Bend for some time now. Good luck Deck!!!!
Sharp is not a spartan fan. Last year he had a vote in the AP ballot for top 25. Go back and look which writer was always the lowest vote for MSU. Sharp consistently had MSU ranked far below everyone else.I'm constantly amazed at how many Michigan fans read Sharp. He's strictly sparty and like most reporters and newscasters today, preaches his own agena vs the actual news.
Okay connssparty since 1956 the record is 33-24, but it does not matter because all the games count right, Msu wanted to play us, its not michigan's fault that state or mac was not as developed as a program at that time.H2H agreed M has cleaned our clock. But we've suffered thru some real crappy coaches just like the last couple with M. So records can be a reflection on how good your coach is obviously. What I think is a joke are the records prior to MSU joining the Big Ten and having to play all games in AA.
As for dantonio crapping gold, it is my understanding that every M fan thought Bo crapped a gold bouillon. We Spartan fans hope we have our version of Bo.
If that's the case, Hoke's wins against Kelly must have put you on lithium.Knowing how BRIAN KELLY kicked the evre living sh*t out of that crap program of yours, and then ditchedthem like a fat girl before prom night, must really burn you
Don't worry buddy
I pointed out EXACTLY how Michigan's season was going to go last year (and was 100% right) and that's a trend that's not going anywhere
Prepare for another season packed with losses and pathetic offense
I agree with Sharp about nothing.... he is the most negative person reporting on sports and ca suck eggs all day long I no longer read him and never wil again.I'm sure you do Spartan fan. Of course you want Michigan to go 7-6 or 6-6. That's not going to happen under Harbaugh and you know that. Michigan's roster is not that depleted and because the Big 10 had success in the bowls last year does not make the conference suddenly as good as the SEC from top to bottom. I do agree with Sharp and that is right now the Big 10 is a ONE team show and that would be OSU. From top to bottom, it is nowhere the football conference like the SEC is and that is a fact that can;t be argued. Playing Purdue, Illinois, Indiana is a far cry from going to South Carolina, Ole Miss, or Tennessee every week. The SEC has a number of RECENT national championships from different programs and OSU is the ONLY Big 10 team to win it since the 2000's began. The other would have been Michigan in 1997. When did the Spartans win a national championship? Was Nixon or Lincoln in office then?
I assume 38-0 and 38-0 were even more glorious. And we get the TUOS "pick the time frame in which the games matter" strategy, but it's still idiotic.michigan will be lucky to win more than seven. You can pencil in Ls @Utah, MSU, OSU and @ Penn St. You can count one of @Minn, @Maryland and Northwestern as well. That is five. Considering the lack of a passing game and the improvement in some of the teams played, expecting more is delusional.
Oh, and for the twits that post on this site..
1. Yes, you lead the all time series with ND by a few games played before your grandfather was born. Congratulations.
2. Yes, ND was in the championship game in 2012. michigan didn't make it to the championship game even once during the entire BCS era.
3. If ND counted NCs like your rival OSU, ND would also count 1993 when they were voted champs by the same poll that voted OSU champs in 1970.
4. 31-0. I was there, and it was glorious. The only dimming factor? Michigan was a really bad team last year. Now how is that team going to suddenly become undefeated? Harbaugh? He also has never been to a championship game as a college coach (or player).
Knowing how BRIAN KELLY kicked the evre living sh*t out of that crap program of yours, and then ditchedthem like a fat girl before prom night, must really burn you
Don't worry buddy
I pointed out EXACTLY how Michigan's season was going to go last year (and was 100% right) and that's a trend that's not going anywhere
Prepare for another season packed with losses and pathetic offense
4. 31-0. I was there, and it was glorious. The only dimming factor? Michigan was a really bad team last year. Now how is that team going to suddenly become undefeated? Harbaugh? He also has never been to a championship game as a college coach (or player).
Hopefully when he gets to an NC, he won't piss down his leg like Kelly did.
I'm not buying it and even with Alabama's defeat at the hands of the Buckeyes. The SEC BOTH East and West are much tougher that the Big 10. Playing at Ole Miss, South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, LSU, Auburn, Bama, Florida week after week takes a toll on these teams. I can't stand Drew Sharp, but his article about this was SPOT ON in today's Detroit Free Press. He did find time to hammer Harbaugh because he hates Michigan so much. Nevertheless, MSU would possibly lose 3-4 games in either division in the SEC every year and I really believe that. Finally, of course Michigan has benefitted with MSU being down but MSU has al;ways been down in football with the exception of the last few years so where is the argument because its MSU that has to continue to climb to get respect on the national level. Michigan does not because they had it and the program tanked for awhile just like Bama,Tenn, USC, etc. Everyone knows they are coming back under Harbaugh. This is not Rich Rod or Brady Hoke. This is Harbaugh fer Godsakes!!!!!!!
Come on now. The SEC is EXCELLENT from top to bottom. Just because OSU beat Bama 1 time I guess has made you forget what your OVERALL record against the SEC is and I can tell you that it is terrible . As far as the SEC getting rolled in bowls last year, the Big 10 has usually been the standard for that over the past 20 years instead of last year. Michigan was the ONLY Big 10 team with a winning record against the SEC until the past 8 years. Your statement on not knowing how good the SEC is in football is hilarious. Just ask yourself how many NC's they have won in the past 10 years and there is your answer. They are damn good period and they will be good this year. Auburn this year will certainly challenge the Bucks IF you make it back to the game and that is a big IF despite the players you are returning. Speaking of players that you mentioned, 99% of those at Michigan right now on the roster were also offered by OSU so the COACHING has been the difference between the two.
Also not true about the 99% on UM's roster were offered by OSU. Your starting RB for example who is probably the 2nd highest overall rated recruit you have on the team besides Peppers was not offered. Don't have the time to go through them all but I'd be happy to take any wager on that percentage. In fact I'd bet not even 80% had offers from OSU.Come on now. The SEC is EXCELLENT from top to bottom. Just because OSU beat Bama 1 time I guess has made you forget what your OVERALL record against the SEC is and I can tell you that it is terrible . As far as the SEC getting rolled in bowls last year, the Big 10 has usually been the standard for that over the past 20 years instead of last year. Michigan was the ONLY Big 10 team with a winning record against the SEC until the past 8 years. Your statement on not knowing how good the SEC is in football is hilarious. Just ask yourself how many NC's they have won in the past 10 years and there is your answer. They are damn good period and they will be good this year. Auburn this year will certainly challenge the Bucks IF you make it back to the game and that is a big IF despite the players you are returning. Speaking of players that you mentioned, 99% of those at Michigan right now on the roster were also offered by OSU so the COACHING has been the difference between the two.
What is the OSU overall record against the SEC? Please post this before you start calling them out or is it that Koolaid your drinking after scoring one victory out of 9 straight losses. Also, please post the amount of NC by the SEC in the last 10 years. Here is the Big 10
OSU. 2014.
Facts are facts- the SEC is the best in football period despite having 1 poor bowl showing in the last 30 years.
Don't forget to add the OSU back to back bowl losses to South Carolina when Holtz was the coach before Spurrier arrived. Then Florida under Urby.
Virginia Tech beat the snot out of you at home and they are in the ACC so I would be careful scheduling a series in places like Baton Rouge each year. They are just as good on the road. Easier for you to keep going to Champaigne to play. I would say Ann Arbor but that won't be the case anymore with Harbaugh the coach because COACHING makes the difference. Ask yourself why Fickell went 6-7 with the same players Urby went 12-0 with. Urby didn't go out and haul in the #1 recruiting class before his first year. He coached that team
I'll take Harbaugh over Kelly any day and twice on Saturday.
Most fan bases would.
Kelly hasn't done shit in South Bend - he only looks good compared to Weis - but that's not much of a stretch.
As much as I don't wanna defend UM, could you define "a hell of a lot more"? Harbaugh at least has a BCS bowl win under his belt with the Orange Bowl while he was at Stanford. Kelly's biggest win is possibly the Music City Bowl from this past season.Haha - he's accomplished a hell of a lot more than your coach.
Haha - he's accomplished a hell of a lot more than your coach.
Harbaughs biggest victory of his career is an Orange Bowl though so it's not like he's got this fantastic resume. Harbaughs resume looks like Coopers from Ohio State, won a bunch of games with very little to show for it.
Yawn. Tell me what cooper did again in the pros? Sure, different league but he had had success at every level. Not to mention he took over programs that were horrible in college and completely turned them around. Keep telling yourself that, though
Cooper won one less partially big game in the NFL than Jimmy. I'm sorry but hanging your hat on a semifinal victory gets you no kudos. Besides Saban sucked in the NFL and he's been extremely successful in college. Chip Kelly owned Jimmy in college and Jimmy had more success thus far in the NFL. Urban took over crappy programs and turned them around way faster than it took Jimmy to turn around Stanford. What is it with you UM guys avoiding my statements. You never really disputed the fact that Jimmy's biggest win is an Orange Bowl victory.
Keep dreaming. What is it with you Buckeyes trying to avoid the facts. Yeah, urban really took over crappy programs at Florida and Ohio state. Give me a break. Stanford was 1-11 when Harbaugh got there!! Sure Urban did well at Utah, but where he had the greatest success, Florida and now Ohio state, the resources and talent he has had to work with are far superior to what Jim had at Stanford when he got their. And if you want to compare what Urban did at Utah and Bowling Green, let's remember the cream puff conferences he did his "turnaround" jobs at there. Heck, if you want to go by that then we can say Brady Hoke did a great job because he "turned around" Ball State. Keep living in your little dream world, but fact is cooper doesn't hold a candle to Harbaugh. And Harbaugh did a far better turnaround job than what urban did anywhere else. Sorry to tell you that but you blind homerism with Urby has really clouded your judgement.