2017 Michigan Class

[klemman]

31-0. That shows the scraps that o$u are

First, when you have to use another team's success to trash talk, you really aren't trash talking at all. Secondly, do you really think 31-0 bothers OSU fans all that much? Two years out from winning a NC and knowing that the team had 44 freshman this year dampens the disappointment. Michigan had a very good recruiting class this year. High in quality but the ranking for what it's worth was aided by the numbers. Since you guys needed numbers that's not a bad thing. OSU got for again what it's worth, a higher quality class in rankings but was hurt by the quantity- which they didn't need. Both classes achieved their purposes, kind of dumb to argue at this point which team had a better class.

 

[PharmD Blue]

First, when you have to use another team's success to trash talk, you really aren't trash talking at all. Secondly, do you really think 31-0 bothers OSU fans all that much? Two years out from winning a NC and knowing that the team had 44 freshman this year dampens the disappointment. Michigan had a very good recruiting class this year. High in quality but the ranking for what it's worth was aided by the numbers. Since you guys needed numbers that's not a bad thing. OSU got for again what it's worth, a higher quality class in rankings but was hurt by the quantity- which they didn't need. Both classes achieved their purposes, kind of dumb to argue at this point which team had a better class.

Lol. 31-0 will always be funny. Again, you are missing the point here. If you go strictly by how rivals does their final team rankings it goes by the top 20 players in each class. This prevents those teams that have very large classes from having overinflated rankings. But it is really meaningless at this point to argue, which I agree with you on. Both teams had very, very good classes and the coming years will decide which was truly better.