Correct me if I'm wrong, but does ND's relationship with the ACC include all the academic research advantages that would have been afforded with full-fledged, B10 membership and for which I understand professors at UND were advocating for in considering B10 membership years ago? Honestly, I don't know if ND has such a relationship with the ACC.
However, assuming the answer is "no" and you don't enjoy full membership in the ACC academic community, then my point stands, UND sacrifices academic relationships that would significantly deepen the academic research and partnership of its students and professors at the feet of the idols of football and NBC contracts. Also, you didn't read my note carefully, I didn't say the ACC was academic crap, of course they're not nor is UND, I said your relationship with the league is a joke.
Let me put a fine point on this, until you guys join a big boy league where you have to claw for 9-10 weeks every year to a conference championship that will determine whether you legitimately belong in the playoffs, you don't have my respect. Truth is, I believe UND would likely be another PSU in the B10 (we don't know for sure because of their stupid independent status) and their love of money keeps them on the conference sidelines, not some bullshit about Yost hating Catholics or independent tradition or whatever horse manure their fan base spews. UND has a sweet, hand-picked schedule, with comfortable, hand-picked buffers between tough games, not a largely mandated schedule by a conference office, and yet has failed for 30 years to produce a serious NC run, unless you count that ass-kicking a couple years ago.
I'm with Bo.