or just more BS?
“The Conference is highly concerned about the University's statements in its November 8 response that it "has not yet had an opportunity to review almost any of the evidence" and that "[f]rom what we can tell, your [notice] largely relies on rumor." Univ. Resp. at 1, 7. We know from the evidence provided to the Conference by the NCAA on November 9 that the University had been provided the Master Spreadsheet, numerous other corroborating documents, photographs, and videos, and significant interview recordings, all of which confirm the existence of the impermissible scheme
“The Conference is highly concerned about the University's statements in its November 8 response that it "has not yet had an opportunity to review almost any of the evidence" and that "[f]rom what we can tell, your [notice] largely relies on rumor." Univ. Resp. at 1, 7. We know from the evidence provided to the Conference by the NCAA on November 9 that the University had been provided the Master Spreadsheet, numerous other corroborating documents, photographs, and videos, and significant interview recordings, all of which confirm the existence of the impermissible scheme
