ADVERTISEMENT

Been chewing on something…

KevinWerner

Michigan Man
Gold Member
May 11, 2006
24,144
18,494
113
Moore recently said he spent half his time on NIL.

This is IN season.

How much time do we think Jim spent on those types of issues? 5%? Who knows right but way less than Sherrone is safe right?

So all those hours Jim, a much more experienced and safe to say without insulting Sherrone, BETTER coach applied some multiple approaching 150% more time devoted to cosching the team?

Theres a lot of crappy implications there.

It at the very least says that in the post Jim era the team is more heavily the product of the work of its (lesser) assistants than was the case under Jim.

You don’t only lose Jim, you lose the relative percentage focus of Sherrone.

This transition couldn’t possibly have been more challenging in terms of the unique circumstances it provided.

We’ve all focused on what it brought (a lot of returning talent on D…a good chunk of which got injured)

But in my opinion the mitigating circumstances of handling extreme staff turnover talent problems on O, the toughest schedule I’ve ever seen for a big ten team and the advent of the NIL era WAY outweigh the benefits of good returning talent on D.

We still might have the right guy - he’s just still got a heap of work to do to position this thing right for the new reality.

Thoughts?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back