To send all of this "Michigan State is the dominant program" talk back to where it belongs? Every time I see an article, the authors are latching on to how Michigan has lost the state and may never get it back. Huh? I guess almost a hundred years of dominance gets forgotten during a negative dip. Granted, the negative dip has gone on for too long, but to prove how weak this argument is, I'd bet if we rattled off 3 consecutive, this talk would be put back into perspective. JMO. How many wins do you thin it would take?
