didn't see Northwestern.
1. Iowa. Looked like a team that would finish .500 in the Pac 12. Anyone sense that Stanford was bored? I expected much more and it's not like Iowa should be flat. I know Stanford is good but Iowa was the outright winner of BT worst performance.
2. MSU. Say what you want...MSU played hard but was overmatched by Alabama. At least it looked like MSU was playing hard until the end (when I stopped watching early in 4th qtr). In fact...the game could have been 10-7 if I recall if not for a bad int. Competitive for the 1st half. More than I can say for the RB.
3. Northwestern. Didn't watch the game but I can just imagine the performance from the score and this is a team that got hammered by UM. I assume the point spread for at least 10 pts?
Iowa should be banned from going to the Rose Bowl because even back in the day when Iowa was a really good team in the Fry era they still got blown out.
RM
1. Iowa. Looked like a team that would finish .500 in the Pac 12. Anyone sense that Stanford was bored? I expected much more and it's not like Iowa should be flat. I know Stanford is good but Iowa was the outright winner of BT worst performance.
2. MSU. Say what you want...MSU played hard but was overmatched by Alabama. At least it looked like MSU was playing hard until the end (when I stopped watching early in 4th qtr). In fact...the game could have been 10-7 if I recall if not for a bad int. Competitive for the 1st half. More than I can say for the RB.
3. Northwestern. Didn't watch the game but I can just imagine the performance from the score and this is a team that got hammered by UM. I assume the point spread for at least 10 pts?
Iowa should be banned from going to the Rose Bowl because even back in the day when Iowa was a really good team in the Fry era they still got blown out.
RM