It seems that many college coaches believe that the 3-3-5 is the best way to slow down the spread offense. UM has seemingly moved into this defense the last few
years. I see that Iowa state plays it as well because most (if not all) the teams in the big 12 run the spread. Teams that run the 3-3-5 seemingly have a really
difficult time stopping power running teams. UM has been bullied badly by wiscy. I know that Iowa State hasn't been able to beat iowa. Ohio state also seems to stick with the
4 man front for the most part. They usually destroy all teams in the big ten because most of them are power running teams and the few that run the spread are so below the
talent that they put on the field that they can get by with it, but have gotten beat (and sometimes soundly) by Clemson who runs the spread.
My question is this : I know that the most common answer that people will say is that you have to have multiple defenses, but is there a college team that even does this well? Is the middle ground between the
two a 3-4 defense?
years. I see that Iowa state plays it as well because most (if not all) the teams in the big 12 run the spread. Teams that run the 3-3-5 seemingly have a really
difficult time stopping power running teams. UM has been bullied badly by wiscy. I know that Iowa State hasn't been able to beat iowa. Ohio state also seems to stick with the
4 man front for the most part. They usually destroy all teams in the big ten because most of them are power running teams and the few that run the spread are so below the
talent that they put on the field that they can get by with it, but have gotten beat (and sometimes soundly) by Clemson who runs the spread.
My question is this : I know that the most common answer that people will say is that you have to have multiple defenses, but is there a college team that even does this well? Is the middle ground between the
two a 3-4 defense?
