ADVERTISEMENT

Interesting Harbugh investigation article by Wetzel

Anison

Michigan Man
Gold Member
Jul 2, 2001
59,380
41,511
113

It explains the process whereby the negotiated resolution with UM and NCAA staff was denied by a three member panel of the COI (using a similar analogy to the one @Highbury put forward yesterday).

It also goes on to explain in some detail multiple problems with the statement issued by the NCAA. Namely…
- Publicly comments on a case they aren’t supposed to speak on
- Publicly states the allegations despite not having issued a letter of allegation (note: UM acknowledged getting a *draft* letter in January)
- Publicly refutes the “it’s just a cheeseburger” defense without UM having itself made that public defense
- Publicly comments on a case the COI is not yet supposed to know the details

Interesting that the article also refers to a six game suspension as customary for a coach lying to investigators. I don’t recall that precedent.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back