ADVERTISEMENT

If you had the choice....would you take Rudock as the starter for next

Reality Man

Heisman
Feb 9, 2002
10,292
176
63
year or prefer to try and develop an even more 'dynamic' talent.

Hypothetical. I am just gauging how the board feels about the entirety of the Rudock performance...the good and bad. I think this is an interesting question because you know what you got with Rudock and don't know what O'korn or others can do.

Would you prefer the safe choice or a potential upgrade? Nobody really knows how O'korn, Morris, Gentry or Peters for that matter. I hope UM can get another 5th year grad transfer to compete. Rudock did a nice job and I think people will miss the last half of Rudock who in my opinion was the MVP of the team with all due respect to the significantly improved Chesson.



RM
 
A lot of unknowns with O'Korn... potentially greater upside he but also has less experience than Rudock. At the end of the year Rudock was playing as well as anyone in the country. I would always choose a known commodity over an unknown one. Even though we know O'Korn has talent we have yet to see him play here whereas we know where Jake is right now.
 
The way Ruddock played from the Indiana game onwards is the best I have seen a QB play at Michigan over a 5 game stretch. He was lights out. And mind you he did this without a NFL caliber WR that other teams have...Chesson is very good but Chesson is no Braylon. And we had no running game either - hats off to Rudock!
 
I would take Rudock.
That being said, we have 2 great receivers in Chesson and Butt.
Chesson maybe didn't have Braylon's numbers but in terms of talent, there's not much difference.
Darboh isn't a bad #3 option either.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT