and what is done is done. I watched the fx series at that was good and I have watched a few hours of this recent series and I truly do understand all the perspectives.
But back to the point I wanted to make that I had never heard before but makes a lot of sense. There is no way Mark Furhman could have planted evidence. Why? Because as the one interviewee said....Furhman would have had to have known that OJ had no alibi during this period. Why would Furhman plant evidence if OJ was at a recital or at dinner or wherever. It would have immediately turned the focus on the police and himself that evidence was planted.
At least I found it interesting. By the way...innocent black people have served time and one black guy (at least biologically) got off. Something tells me the black community is still way behind in the murder/conviction/not guilty count.
RM
But back to the point I wanted to make that I had never heard before but makes a lot of sense. There is no way Mark Furhman could have planted evidence. Why? Because as the one interviewee said....Furhman would have had to have known that OJ had no alibi during this period. Why would Furhman plant evidence if OJ was at a recital or at dinner or wherever. It would have immediately turned the focus on the police and himself that evidence was planted.
At least I found it interesting. By the way...innocent black people have served time and one black guy (at least biologically) got off. Something tells me the black community is still way behind in the murder/conviction/not guilty count.
RM
