I am visibly upset. The Pats did not deserve to win.
- Thread starter John4UM
- Start date
You're absolutely right! Brady is taller right?
And why did they not deserve to win? They were clearly the better team.
And why did they not deserve to win? They were clearly the better team.
Brady did not deserve to win the SB MVP.
Quit trying to justify the cheap win by the Pats. They were like a washed up former heavyweight boxing champ hanging on the rope for dear life (see Ali and Holmes). Also, Brady is not the Brady from 2003-2004. At best he has two more years left. I think this is Brady's last SB win. He will not get lucky again. Montana's team would've destroyed Brady's team.
I hate the cheating Pats.
Quit trying to justify the cheap win by the Pats. They were like a washed up former heavyweight boxing champ hanging on the rope for dear life (see Ali and Holmes). Also, Brady is not the Brady from 2003-2004. At best he has two more years left. I think this is Brady's last SB win. He will not get lucky again. Montana's team would've destroyed Brady's team.
I hate the cheating Pats.
Ha, they just won. Brady had the most spectacular 4th quarter in the history of the Super Bowl. Brady, Gronk, and Wilfork are the only hall of famers on the team...which tells you how amazing he really is. Montana's 49er teams were LOADED with hall of fame talent. Brady is the best in the game. Deal with it.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Are you 12? Just asking because you sound like a child a bit. The pats were lucky? You must not have watched the game at all.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Re: Brady did not deserve to win the SB MVP.
Cheap? Lucky? What if the Seahawks won? would you call it lucky or cheap? Because those catches that Scearse (?) made at the end of the superbowl and GB were both lucky.
You are terrible with this nonsense.
It's not cheap or lucky.
did you see the play that kid made to pick the ball off? how was that lucky?
did you see Brady lead the Pats down the field not 1x but 2x when down 10 needing points? how is that lucky?
get over it.
It's not cheap or lucky.
did you see the play that kid made to pick the ball off? how was that lucky?
did you see Brady lead the Pats down the field not 1x but 2x when down 10 needing points? how is that lucky?
get over it.
did you look in the mirror...
...to determine that you're "visibly upset," or did you take someone else's word for it?
...to determine that you're "visibly upset," or did you take someone else's word for it?
Re: Brady did not deserve to win the SB MVP.
You sound grumpy man...maybe you need another hobby. The game is played on the field and on the field the Pats won it outright. You are right Brady is washed up and terrible, only set all sorts of all-time records this season. How horrible of him. If Montana didn't suck as he got older, if Ryan Leaf didn't have all sorts of issues, if Manning didn't injure his neck...blah blah blah. Seriously listen to yourself. The game of NFL is as much about performance is it is about longevity and folks like Brady, Farve, Manning, etc that have been able to perform at a high level for 15+ years are amazing QBs! Who gives a shit if he is better then Montana or not?
Also, you really think deflated balls would have changed the outcome of a 45-7 game? Perhaps if the balls were not deflated the Colts would have score 950 points??? Or maybe Luck would have developed wings and flown into the end-zone.
You sound grumpy man...maybe you need another hobby. The game is played on the field and on the field the Pats won it outright. You are right Brady is washed up and terrible, only set all sorts of all-time records this season. How horrible of him. If Montana didn't suck as he got older, if Ryan Leaf didn't have all sorts of issues, if Manning didn't injure his neck...blah blah blah. Seriously listen to yourself. The game of NFL is as much about performance is it is about longevity and folks like Brady, Farve, Manning, etc that have been able to perform at a high level for 15+ years are amazing QBs! Who gives a shit if he is better then Montana or not?
Also, you really think deflated balls would have changed the outcome of a 45-7 game? Perhaps if the balls were not deflated the Colts would have score 950 points??? Or maybe Luck would have developed wings and flown into the end-zone.
Montana was always an arrogant A hole that was surrounded by top tier talent. Wouldve been interesting to see how successful he would've been if he was in Brady's place! I believe his attitude would've prevented him from "dominance"
Similar threads
