Recruiting classes are nice, but I've always viewed success as a college coach as 1/3 recruiting, 1/3 coaching up players, 1/3 in-game decisions. A good coach can turn 25th-ish,15th-ish,25th-ish classes (14/15/16 for PSU) into successful teams. It's fair to question Franklin's acumen in coaching up players and in-game decisions (although, to his credit, Franklin has never blown a game for the lack of doing "max protect" on a punt
). But I'm not concerned with the recruiting classes.
"Dominate the state" was boisterous, but still: the next time Narduzzi has a major recruiting service rank a Pitt class higher than a PSU class, that will be a first.
I don't like using the sanctions as a crutch, but they DID occur. There's a little bit of a talking point among non-PSU folk that "the NCAA really let PSU off the hook with the sanction reduction", but people who say that are speaking complete nonsense. The sanctions were definitely significant, and it is a headwind PSU has faced in 2014 (PSU finished
sixth in the B1G East in 2014) & 2015, and will have remnant effects in 2016 too (it's no longer an excuse in 2017).
PSU had young teams in 2014-2015, is increasing depth coming off sanctions, has had non-bad recruiting classes in each of the last 3 years, and shoot, QB cannot be
worse in 2016. I'm not a big Franklin fan, but given all that, the odds of a PSU near-term collapse seem low. I'm not sure why you would want a collapse anyway? Wouldn't you rather have a mediocre coach who keeps Penn State in an annual "6-to-8 win spin cycle"?